Posted by Peter Sachs on Dec. 29, 2008 at 4:00 am
Economy hurts general aviation makers; very light jets take blows
The deep recession was bad news for every general aviation manufacturer as orders dried up and potential customers found they were unable to get loans for new planes. While manufacturers tried to downplay their problems, nearly every piston plane maker had to either lay off workers or reduce production schedules by this fall. Piston plane makers weren’t the only ones suffering, either. Much of Cessna’s business jet base dried up as well as corporations scaled back expansion plans and looked for ways to save as fuel hit record highs over the summer, a pattern that repeated itself at companies like Hawker Beechcraft and Bombardier.
2008 was a year of truth for the fledgling very light jet industry. While Cessna pushed steadily forward with deliveries of its Mustang VLJ and Embraer started shipping the Phenom 100 to customers earlier this month, other manufacturers didn’t do so well. Adam Aircraft went bankrupt in February; its new owners hope to certify the A700 jet by 2010 but have abandoned the centerline-thrust A500 turboprop. In September, air taxi company DayJet went belly up, foreshadowing Eclipse’s bankruptcy just before Thanksgiving. Eclipse’s assets are set to go on the auction block in early January, leaving the fate of the pioneering VLJ unclear for now.
Small planes offer promise in fold-up models
The bright spot for general aviation this year was in the progress made on small planes. Cessna’s light sport aircraft, the Model 162 SkyCatcher, began flight tests. One test plane was destroyed in a crash during spin testing (the pilot parachuted and landed unhurt), and Cessna said in response it was making minor design changes to improve the 162’s aerodynamics. Cessna plans to start delivering the planes in late 2009 or early 2010. Another segment that had the public’s attention this year: light sport planes that could fit in a driveway. Icon Aircraft began flight tests of its A5, an amphibious model with fold-up wings that will allow the plane to be transported on a small trailer. The company aims to have the A5 in production by late 2010. If being able to drive your plane into your driveway is more appealing, Terragufia hopes to have an answer. The company is in the early phases of testing a plane that could convert into a small car after it lands at an airport. Its makers call the plane a “roadable aircraft” to separate it from the ill-fated “flying cars” that have failed to take off in the past. The Terrafugia would be certified as a light sport aircraft with a 460-mile range in the air. Motors would fold the wings after landing and it would fit in a standard automobile garage.
FAA, Air Force find themselves in hot water
StudentPilot.com readers agreed that the scandal involving Southwest Airlines and the FAA was one of the most newsworthy government-related aviation stories in 2008. Mid-level managers at the FAA tacitly let Southwest skip mandatory fuselage inspections that would have checked for fatigue cracks, and the airline flew dozens of flights on planes that weren’t airworthy as a result. When the news broke, the scandal quickly broadened. Whistleblowers throughout the FAA said they had been pressured to turn a blind eye on maintenance lapses. As a result, American, Delta and United all grounded planes for various reasons, resulting in thousands of flight cancellations last spring. The FAA fined Southwest more than $10 million for its inspection lapses and pledged internal reforms, including new systems that would let employees report incidents without being intimidated by their bosses.
Other government agencies had their share of trouble in 2008, too. The U.S. Air Force struggled, and failed, to seal the deal on a $35-billion contract to replace its fleet of aging KC-135 midair refueling tankers. The two bidders were Boeing, which proposed a modified 767, and Airbus, which would have used a variant of the larger A330. When the Air Force awarded the contract to Airbus, Boeing cried foul, arguing that the Pentagon had changed the rules in the middle of the bidding process and had given Airbus more credit for its larger airframe. The Air Force initially said it would reevaluate both planes, but then scrapped the entire contract when Boeing said it would need more time to tweak the 777 for the tanker program. With all efforts stalled for several months, it will be up to Barack Obama’s administration to pick up the pieces.
Boeing struggles through challenges
If the tanker contract put Boeing in the defensive for the first part of the year, a crippling two-month strike left it in that position for the rest of the year. Its Machinists union, which includes many assembly line workers, hit the picket line in early September. Concerns over how Boeing would outsource future aircraft manufacturing work were among the top concerns for the union. In early November, Machinists voted overwhelmingly in favor of a four-year contract — one year longer than usual — that assures substantial pay raises but does not give workers much protection from outsourcing. The two-month strike meant Boeing’s production lines were idle for that time, setting the company behind in orders it had booked and giving Airbus a chance to pull ahead in deliveries for the year. The strike also meant another delay for the 787 Dreamliner, now expected to fly for the first time in mid-2009.
A Chinese manufacturer could be a future competitor for the likes of Bombardier when it comes to regional jets. The Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China announced in November that the nation’s first regional jet had completed its maiden flight. The ARJ21 will seat up to 90 passengers with a range of about 2,000 nautical miles. So far, the ARJ21 has booked more than 200 orders, mainly from Chinese airlines. If it looks like an MD-90, that’s because it uses much of the same fuselage tooling, though the ARJ21 has a completely new wing design. Expect the plane to take to the skies with passengers aboard in the next year.
2009: The year of green aviation?
When Jet-A prices spiked in the summer of 2008, airlines responded by raising fares, tacking on fuel surcharges, and making customers pay for checked luggage. But industry executives also acknowledged that they needed to start looking for ways to save fuel in the long term. Different fuels could be one solution. Early in 2008, Virgin Atlantic successfully tested a 20-percent biofuel mix in one of the engines of a 747 on a flight from London to Amsterdam. Sometime in early 2009, Continental, Air New Zealand and Japan Air Lines are all expected to make test flights using biofuel mixtures. The promise of using a blend of biolfuel and Jet-A is that it would save money without requiring substantial alterations to jet engines. The tests in the coming year could provide an indication of how realistic those hopes are. Simpler changes could save airlines money, too. Air New Zealand showed off how an optimized descent at the end of a long-haul flight could save thousands of pounds of fuel. The test required hefty coordination with air traffic controllers beforehand, though. Making the practice widespread would require that controllers move away from issuing step-down descents, which use more fuel because jet engines must spool up each time a plane levels off at a lower altitude.
For more year-in-review recaps, take a look at the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization, which highlighted some of its successes in 2008. The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association took at look at many of the low points in general aviation in the past year and also reviewed some of the pilots who made the news.